Sunday, May 8, 2011

The Good, the Bad & the Darn Right Scary

Over the past week I have seriously indulged. Not only in copious amount of barbecued burgers and chicken, but also in horror. Yes, that genre, that's forever churning out remakes/reboots/reimaginings it would seem nowadays, is one that has dominated my past 7 days with a trio of, wait for it, original horror films.

It's true that horror flicks can affect an audience in completely different ways depending on the medium it's viewed in. The cinema offers (literally) the bigger scares, booming surround sound that creeps up from all corners and a general consensus that everyone else in the theatre is more than likely 'bricking it' just as much as you. Then you've got the home screenings. DVD or Blu-ray certainly has its advantages of a private screening, but can sometimes lack the atmosphere a theatre provides, but it's alright for those who have a pleasing set up of a home cinema complete with 50 inch TV... And of course, you thankfully avoid the nervous audience laughter that suggests they would prefer, instead, to be hiding under their covers crying themselves to sleep.

The horror threesome under review are The Unborn, REC 2 and, newly released, Insidious. The  latter having been revealed as the biggest earning film of 2011 so far, cost a mere $1m to make with it already making $45m so far in the US alone, could end up making worldwide sales of around the $90m mark. Not bad for small time director James Wan, comfortably out doing the likes of the Wes Craven's disappointing Scream 4.
_________________________________________________________
Insidious - In cinemas now

There's been much talk regarding this movie. James Wan's Insidious is touted as a genuinely scary experience, but does it live up to frightening nature of The Blair Witch Project or Paranormal Activity? Granted, Insidious is a different kind of horror, it strays from the now common home made, shaky cam footage and instead opts for something that is overtly fictional without any ambiguity regarding its authenticity.

The story of a generic family who move into a new home and proceed to be haunted by supernatural nasties doesn't tread new ground, but surprisingly the style of the movie is its refreshing aspect here. It doesn't try to be anything it isn't. Simple shots, classic set ups and scares are what strangely gives it charm. It's obvious, from the over dramatic score and sudden reveal of the title, at the beginning that Wan's influence of 70's horror is apparent and continues to pay homage throughout. On a basic level, his genre clichéd techniques are intended to make audiences jump, yet one can pick up on a tongue in cheek approach to the film, which does confuse opinion as to whether it takes itself seriously or not.

Starring Patrick Wilson (Watchmen) and Rose Byrne (28 Weeks Later), the pair, along with their three kids, move into a new home where typically strange things begin to happen, suggesting something paranormal is lurking. The focus of the story is on their son Dalton who, after a ghostly encounter in the dark and spooky attic, falls into a coma. Cue a safe story that uses the most basic of plot devices to inform us of Dalton's out of body 'travels' in his sleep, wandering a realm between the living and the dead, which encourages demons to possess his body. It's that straight forward.

As discussed earlier, it's not your typical modern horror. References to Poltergeist and other such iconic horror flicks are evident, but what Insidious does do is to blend the modern with the classic.

It cannot be denied, there are some well executed scary moments but they are unfortunately too few and far between. Surprisingly these notable scares are not done for cheap frights either. Simple imagery works well rather than constructing cheap ways to terrify, which I found to be a pleasing approach. However, the too-few-and-far-between chilling moments are dwarfed by the inept nature of other aspects including the acting, or lack of it. Whether intentional or not, it ruins the atmosphere with desperately poor performances (specifically aiming criticisms towards the leads). Unless a wooden, awkward style was intentional, then it failed completely as it actively makes audiences aware they are watching a film. Performance wise, the only positives were enjoyable cameos from the duo of ghost busters Specs (Leigh Whannel) and Tucker (Angus Sampson) but sadly it's too little too late.

The story, as with most mediocre horror films, lets it down too. At times it borders on silly territory with a somewhat bizarre climax involving dark corridors, numerous candles and smoke machines. One almost anticipates the appearance of Meat Loaf walking on set to belt out a number- it's that kind of cheesy ridiculousness. The narrative continues to limp along whilst occasionally threatening to morph into a decent horror but loses its way and seems confused itself at times. The imbalance between tongue-in-cheek scary, intentionally scary and insanely silly becomes more unsure as it concludes; its narrative structure doesn't suffice nor sustain belief or momentum.

It's evident to see what Wan is trying to achieve. On one level his vision was to create a homage; a tribute to a beloved genre whilst also retaining credibility as an individual, modern, yet slightly tongue in cheek film and sort of works as a quaint, personal project . On all fronts though it's a shame to conclude that it doesn't quite resonate as planned.

It's likable as much as it is throw away. Something to pass an evening, but ultimately rewards you with very little. Aside from the odd decent moment of horror, the rest fails to gel as a film. Never does it gather sustainable pace or evoke much interest or intensity thanks to the cheesy and heavy handed approach. There's a fine line of success when a director chooses to tackle a film the way Wan does- you either nail it with conviction and credibility or fail it with characters and plot that feel terribly clichéd - Insidious isn't great nor is it dire, it sort of floats in a realm in between.

★★
_________________________________________________________
The Unborn - Available on DVD & Blu-ray now

There's not much to say regarding this formulaic, cheap scares-and little else-horror flick, so I'll get right to the point. The acting is weak and, coupled with a dull story, becomes a bit of a drag in places. Towards the latter half hour- motives chillingly unknown- Gary Oldman joins the cast but sadly doesn't alter the dynamic of a dire story that plays out as clichéd  as a Disney narrative, only with more disturbing imagery.

Admittedly the trailer was cleverly cut to connote a terrifying, decent looking film, revealing rather a lot of terror during its daytime airings, which lead me to believe the actual film would succeed in scaring the pants off me. Sadly it failed to materialise into anything one may deem credible as a horror film, thus ruining my intrigued anticipation.

Aside from the story, it was the special effects that let it down so severely. What was surely intended to replicate an Emily Rose-cum-Silent Hill style nasty turned out to be an ineffective, shambolic attempt. Most disturbing (ironically) of all set pieces was a hilariously awful crash scene and the amateur nature of its editing. Any tension The Unborn did muster is quickly extinguished by dim characters and their illogical reaction to something crystal clear supernatural phenomenon. At least lead female Odette Annable is pleasing eye candy, but is that really enough to make you sit through this drivel?

★
_________________________________________________________
REC 2 - Available on DVD & Blu-ray now

The third and final review will be, I promise, a lot more positive than the above. Following directly on from the  terrifyingly atmospheric REC, we find ourselves back in the same building literally seconds after the first film ends and the transition is frankly effortless without breaking the fantastic tension its predecessor oozed. From the start the directing is tight and extremely claustrophobic, which works perfectly as we creep down narrow corridors and burst into dark rooms with the SWAT team that have now entered to control the 'situation'.

The performances of the squad are both efficient and well as nervy, which forms believable, real characters. As well as following the SWAT team, a group of curious teens (somehow) sneak in, armed with only a video camera, after witnessing the commotion outside the sealed off building. Again, the acting is naturalistic and develops intensely before both groups inevitably run into one another.

Thankfully the story is strong; it develops at a steady pace and successfully adds to the gritty realism which makes the scares all the more terrifying. The 'sweep and clear' approach of the SWAT team only increases the tension with every breached room, as you wait for the moment until contact is inevitably made.

The plot intends for the team to retrieve a stored blood sample from the source of the outbreak; a young girl who, apparently, is still located in the building. After a rendez-vous with Dr. Owen who escorts them through their mission, all hell (almost literally) breaks loose and the sample is lost, prompting a far more dangerous search for the girl. When the intensity of running-into-the-unknown is met head on with the beasties that lurk in dark corners, the action explodes with a chilling authenticity that will tip you towards the edge of your seat.

As the scenes develop, the plot progresses nicely too, revealing the origins of the nasties that are loitering down dimly lit corridors and in cluttered lofts. An intelligent narrative compliments the acting and fast pace of the film. You're constantly on full alert and are genuinely unsure what will happen next. The downside is the overuse of the shaky cam in some scenes and the film, as a whole, would benefit from some calmer, static scenes to regain ones breath, but in honesty is a minor criticism. It's obvious that the aim from director/writer Jaume Balagueró is to rev up the intensity, induce the panic and fear factors and frankly, fail to cease until the climax. The result is that REC 2 throws you in at the deep end placing you in exactly the same position as the characters.

Whilst REC 2 consistently pushes a story that can be construed as realistic, it does sway a little too much into a religious motive and explanation which I found mildly disappointing. However, coupled with the stylistic direction and a story that, one point towards the climax turns the realism ideal on its head, REC 2 comes together sublimely to leave viewers shaken and on edge.

As sequels go, this not only lives up to it's predecessor but actually improves upon it in places. It also sets up further intriguing possibilities for the franchise to expand and has a nice twist right at the end. If you enjoyed the first, then this is a must.

★★★★

Photos : Google Images

Friday, April 29, 2011

Review: The Lincoln Lawyer

It's fair to say that Matthew McConaughey hasn't always made the best of career choices. Since beginning promisingly with a role in Dazed and Confused almost 20 years ago, the film appearances that followed sank him into a type cast of mediocrity. Rather than striving for anything more substantial, to fulfill the promise he had shown, he appeared content to complacently drift along which, by the way, was a type cast he often portrays; the 'easy going underachiever without-a-care-in-the-world'. Failing to appear in anything of notable quality means that when he does star in a film that's half decent, it's somewhat of a surprise to see him shine with his dormant acting ability.

The Lincoln Lawyer is just that film. In one of his better roles to date (which isn't difficult), the character of hot shot lawyer Mick Haller works for him because he works for the role. The story follows Mick as he shadily conducts his business from the back of his chauffeur driven Lincoln, which inevitably leads him to associate with typically questionable sorts.

Life at this point is easy for Mick. Success and wealth in his profession, convenient hook-ups with tasty ex Maggie (Marissa Tomei), coupled with his womanising lifestyle makes him believe in his own hype, until Louis (Ryan Phillippe) is introduced as his latest client. Playboy Louis is accused of assault and attempted murder and, after strongly denying the claims, insists the woman pressing charges is merely trying to squeeze him. As Mick begins to look into the case and delves deeper, the more inconsistent Louis's story appears, which begins to bare striking similarity to one of his past cases. 
McConaughey plays the part of a slick, smooth talking defence lawyer well, as it's the archetype he can recreate with ease. It's a role he's built for and excels as the smarmy city slicker who, after a couple of plot twists en route, is reduced to a nervous insomniac as we witness him morph into a paranoid, dishevelled and irrational person when put under the spot light himself.

The plot, based on the novel by Michael Connelly, is a clever and well balanced story, with just the right amount of twists and pacing to assert it as one of the most gripping thrillers of the year. Tomei does a worthy job as the emotionally involved ex-partner and shows she can handle a more meaty role after having mostly lightweight parts in recent years. Phillippe also masters the part of the brash and overly assured accused. Phillippe convinces as both the innocent victim as well as the sinister deceiver, displaying a hint of intensity in his performance. Aided by the good chemistry between himself and McConaughey as the story cranks up the tension, the acting adheres a sense of believability to the film. It isn't, however, likely to wow the Oscars panel, but all parties play their roles with a sense of swagger and conviction. Plot intricacies and some dialogue is, admittedly, 'law talk' but the bare essentials of what's occurring still renders it accessible for those unfamiliar with the judiciary spiel.

Acting aside, the most pleasing aspect of The Lincoln Lawyer is how the genre morphs from uber tense thriller into courtroom drama for the remaining 45 minutes or so. The latter setting can be something of a turn off to some as, if not handled correctly, the story can get lost down a cul-de-sac of monotony. Thankfully, the pace and momentum of the first hour spills into the climactic days of Phillippe's trial as he twists and manipulates Mick whilst cleverly remaining on the right side of the law. Never does it feel laboured, whilst the threat is both psychological as well as physical, it's down to the quick thinking, king of legally-screwing-people-over-in-courts Mick to ironically find one of his many loop holes used to defend his clients. The element of danger is only exacerbated when Maggie's life, as well as his own, is threatened, which adds urgency to the climax.

In conclusion a delightfully gripping and intriguing thriller with a notable McConaughey in the lead role. Coupled with a tight script and ample support, The Lincoln Lawyer shows that he can act, he can lead, and he can push himself to hold his weight in more demanding roles which will perhaps help him to regain the credibility his career, for most part, has been lacking. 
★★★★
Sources : Internet Movie Database
Images : Google Images

Sunday, April 17, 2011

A Summer of Sci-Fi

It's no secret that 2011 is going to be a massive year for summer blockbusters with such films as Captain America, The Green Lantern, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 to name but three, as box office revenue prepares to smash last year into oblivion (only by a couple of £billion, mind).

I've picked out a few potential hits and, along with recently previewed Super 8, it looks like a busy 2011 for science fiction and indeed the industry as a whole, having already been gifted the brilliant Source Code earlier this month.


Cowboys & Aliens - 12th August 

Jon Favreau's Cowboys & Aliens is already generating a lot of positive response which is only strengthened by the latest strong, entertaining trailer which sets up quite a spectacle indeed. Daniel Craig, Harrison Ford and Olivia Widle star in this sci fi-western-action adventure genre mash up, which in all honesty looks pretty awesome.



Rise of the Planet of the Apes - August (TBC)

The new trailer for Rise of the Planet of the Apes also looks intriguing to say the least. Sceptical as I am about the title let alone the film, the prequel (starring James Franco & Andy Serkis) explains the origins of how the well known premise came to be. The trailer doesn't look half bad and could turn out to be not as awful as first anticipated.
                                                          


Transformers : Dark of the Moon - 1st July

There's also the third instalment of Michael Bays Transformers franchise, which according to reports, doesn't seem like it will be quite the train wreck Revenge of the Fallen turned out to be. Oh, and did I mention Rosie Huntington-Whiteley has now replaced the abysmal Megan Fox? That might turn out to be one reason to tune in...



Sources : YouTube

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Preview: Super 8

I'll keep this brief so you can experience for yourself the wonder of the latest trailer for J J Abrams Super 8 released on 19th August this year. Set in 1979, the story follows a group of youngsters as they attempt to shoot their first film on their Super 8 camera, when as you can see from the trailer, they witness a devastating train crash and its top secret 'contents' escaping into the night...

Details remain scarce on the juicy specifics, but it's already been likened to an E.T-style adventure (with Speilberg as producer) due to its nostalgic and somewhat familiar territory, but with a nice dose of fear for good measure.

Super 8 looks promising and, amongst the inevitably over rated army of Summer blockbusters to be released over the coming months, seems like one of the most interesting new films out there. Have a watch and see what you think...



Sources : YouTube

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Review: The Adjustment Bureau

Blade Runner. Minority Report. Total Recall. Any of these ring a bell? Perhaps they do. Perhaps you are in the know and recognise the origins of these classic stories as the genius work of Philip K. Dick. A pioneer in science fiction, he dedicated his entire life to exploring and publishing works on the genre and I for one am thankful for it.

The Adjustment Bureau is the latest efforts of his to be adapted into a Hollywood film. Starring Matt  Damon and Emily Blunt, it is a tweaked version of his short story titled  Adjustment Team written in 1954, with director/writer George Nolfi (writer; The Bourne Ultimatum) making alterations from the original by changing names, events and narrative, yet the deviation plunges his project into the 'unknown quantity' category, but claims to maintain the quintessential elements of the premise.

Politician David Norris (Matt Damon) is running for Congress when a chance meeting with Elise Sellas (Emily Blunt) in a restroom sparks an instant love affair. However, a secret organisation known as the Adjustment Bureau, a team of all seeing, all knowing men who adjust humanity's fate, deem that the pair are not 'scheduled' to meet again in their lives. But when they cross paths after a blunder from Norris's minder Harry, (Anthony Mackie) whom fails to adjust his fate, higher figures within the Bureau are forced to step in and prevent the pair from ever finding one another, as doing so will alter their fates for the worse.

It's worth noting that Damon and Blunt initially do a convincing job of creating chemistry and set up interesting characters and, thanks to the screenplay, an intriguing story worth exploring. Nolfi's clearly put his all into the project, yet something about the character development, plot and overall progression is lacking.

It's clear the material presented to Damon and Blunt restricted them in terms of showing off their acting palette. The characters they portray are one dimensional, which is somewhat disappointing after the glimpse of their potential during their first on screen encounter. Admittedly being a bigger follower of Damon than Blunt, it felt like a step back in his career after such prominent roles as Jason Bourne (Bourne Trilogy) and Detective Sullivan (The Departed) to emerge with, at times, a bland and 'mushy' performance that failed to live up to the misinformed claim that the film was 'Bourne meets Inception'. The Adjustment Bureau is neither of these. In fact the amount of action and thrilling elements are severely lacking amongst a preachy, slow moving story about the powers that control life and indeed the planet's destiny. A little too spiritual in places, being somewhat of an atheist, I was left feeling alienated and frankly unconvinced by it's uninspiring plot.

What initially raised expectations were certain aspects regarding the trailer which, whilst it wasn't amazing, pulled me into the world where mysterious men in overcoats control the fates and lives of everyone. Yet even the trailer had problems fizzling out into a weak conclusion, which ultimately reflected in the finished product.

It's important to address some key issues to demonstrate the film's  problems which include inconsistency and questionable logic. The Adjustment Team affirm themselves as an all mighty power over the world. The team are  lead by Richardson (Mad Men's John Slattery) gives the impression that him and his trilby wearing men could do anything, be anywhere, similar to The Matrix's Agent Smith. But as the narrative progresses, we quickly learn that these so-called 'rulers of fate' are no more than sloppy, bumbling fools, thus undermining what they stand for.

Therefore, with no clear threat or fear factor from the Bureau, it makes it difficult to evoke any real concern for our protagonists and fails to create genuine tension within the story. More worrying is the thin and poorly directed plot which, after the characters are established, struggles to build momentum or muster any constructive progression.

Support from Michael Kelly as Norris's political advisor, Charlie, is under used and as the build up to the film's climax is played out, he is nowhere to be seen as the focus becomes solely on David and Elise and their seemingly hopeless attempt to be together, which involves a lot of running and pushing people out of the way.

Towards the latter stages of the film it feels like it doesn't really know where the story is heading, as a conclusion doesn't render logical or conceivably consistent with the premise. As it turns out the climax was bitterly underwhelming as well as ambiguous, and not in a positive way. The result leaves me confused and pondering what exactly it was I witnessed for the 100 or so minutes. Saying that, it  wasn't all a complete wreck. The acting shone with glimmers of quality but the pacing, or lack thereof, left me bored with little plot twist or development.

The original idea from Dick was interesting, as is its concept, yet Nolfi's alterations appear to have stalled what great potential it had. Sadly the story is weak and uninteresting, coupled by a lack of pace and direction required for its genre. Topped off by a lacklustre climax, The Adjustment Bureau becomes a sluggish chore to watch for most parts, while the point of the whole thing remains ambiguously unresolved to say the least, which left me questioning why I even cared in the first place. Compared to Dick's other adaptations, this falls way short of the quality of the aforementioned Blade Runner or Minority Report, which were well executed, superbly directed, atmospheric sci-fi thrillers. The Adjustment Bureau sadly isn't.

★★

Sources : Internet Movie DataBase
Images :  Google Images

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Preview: Source Code

If you're not familiar with 2009's surprise indie hit Moon, then now is the time to educate yourself. Newcomer Duncan Jones directs Sam Rockwell through an interesting and dramatic sci fi unlike no other. Jones (formerly Zowie Bowie and son of David) creates a simple, yet high concept flick, which barely scrapped the surface of the mainstream, yet was a massive hit with critics.

Jones's follow up remains in the realms of science fiction with soon to be released Source Code starring Jake Gyllenhaal and Michelle Monaghan. The trailer is  reminiscent of 2008's Vantage Point which has elements of repeating the same scenario (in this case Gyllenhaal can keep reliving the last 8 minutes of someone's life) but hopefully a much better attempt, more along the quality of Groundhog Day one hopes.

Supported by a strong cast including Vera Farmiga and Jeffrey Wright, Source Code promises to be a much  faster, more thrilling film than Jones's debut, whilst retaining his quality and attention to character development that made Moon so memorable.

Check out the trailers here...





Sources : YouTube

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

The Oscars 2011 : The Aftermath

It was an interesting Oscars 2011. With all the hype at the end of last year surrounding The Social Network, it was the selection of great films that emerged early this year that spoilt David Fincher's preemptive victory. It's no secret that The King's Speech got the most attention and the Oscar buzz, which then became poised to snap up most of the awards it was nominated for.

The aforementioned title was predominantly praised for the performance of Colin Firth, who (some say) rightly went on to win Best Actor, and whilst I agree his performance was excellent, it wasn't one of the most memorable roles, and for me, doesn't sit alongside the greats.
So whilst The King's Speech went on to win four Oscars (Actor, Picture, Director, Original Screenplay), conflicting opinion would suggest there were more worthy winners.
I'll give Firth some acclaim for his role as King George, even though there were other brilliant performances from the likes of Jeff Bridges and James Franco, but lets be honest, Bridges was never going to win the award two years running, it's just how it works. Having seen most of the Best Picture nominees, personal judgement would suggest True Grit, Inception and Toy Story 3 were far better. However, it's not uncommon for the winner of Best Picture and Actor to triumph hand in hand, so no major surprise there.

The big upset for me was that it scooped Best Original Screenplay. I'm in admittance that the writing was excellent, but correct me if I'm wrong, isn't the idea of an original film surely based on an originally conceived idea and not on a true story? For me Inception was far more deserving of winning that award because, simply put, Chris Nolan is a genius. His script is fascinating and one that is completely generated from an original, never before seen idea.
The directing, in both style and substance, didn't really convince me that The King's Speech should win the gong for that acclaim, yet Tom Hooper prevailed. I found Darren Aronofsky's Black Swan to be a far more accomplished and interesting portrayal of his characters, thus a stronger candidate for the Oscar.

Now my The King's Speech rant is over, lets talk about the other big winners. It was a shame that Toy Story 3 was an 'also ran' for Best Picture, mainly because the opposition was so damn strong, but was none the less a truly superb film. Thankfully, as predicted, Pixar claimed Best Animation and rightly so. Toy Story 3 is simply a classic film and a near flawless end to a fantastic trilogy.

The surprise for me was Christian Bale walking away with Best Supporting Actor. I do love Bale and find his acting outstanding for roles in The Machinist, Breaking Dawn and of course; Batman. After seeing The Fighter I was left feeling that he may indeed beat Geoffrey Rush, but still decided to back Rush as I really enjoyed his performance (far more than Firth's). However, I was proved wrong and pleasantly surprised with Bale's win.

Natalie Portman's victory was the most unsurprising of the night. Even though she was challenged by other excellent performances from the likes of Amy Adam (The Fighter), Michelle Williams (Blue Valentine) and Nicole Kidman (Rabbit Hole), Portman was always firm odds on to win. Melissa Leo joined Christian Bale in a successful night winning Best Female Support for The Fighter. Granted her acceptance speech wan't the most dignified, her acting, on the other hand, did impress. Again,I found her performance very strong and spot on, but felt newcomer Hailee Steinfeld was by far the stand out nominee for her role in the Coen's True Grit, which failed to make any real impact on the night. But I don't care, their film was still ridiculously awesome.
Whilst on the thread of True Grit, it was very disappointing for Roger Deakins to miss out on Best Cinematography yet again. What does this man have to do to get the acclaim he deserves?! Instead Inception won, which was still pleasing as it was probably my favorite film of 2010 (with Toy Story 3 a close second).

The less prestigious awards (that are no less deserving in admiration) presented expected outcomes, with Alice In Wonderland winning Costume and Art Direction. Brit nominees Ian Barnes and Samantha Waite missed out on Best Short Film with their efforts for Wish 143, but it was great to see them considered for an Oscar. The one thing that confused me was the Foreign Language Film outcome, which saw Javier Bardem starring in Biutiful, which was surely set to win as it was in the mix for overall Best Picture. Yet it was pipped to the post by In A Better World, which I found strange as Biutiful was competing with the likes of The King's Speech and Black Swan, yet failed to win in it's own sub category.

There were some cool photos from the ceremony, plenty of well dressed stars too and, as is custom, a selection of bad ones. Christian Bale sported a big ginger beard, and a heavily pregnant Natalie Portman looked lovely. But the photo that impressed me most was the one below capturing Jeremy Renner's 'glance' at Scarlett Johansson. I wonder what he was thinking...?
Sources : Google Images